

The MITRE ATT&CK (Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge) framework has become a cornerstone of modern cybersecurity. Since its inception, ATT&CK has provided organizations with a comprehensive, structured approach to understanding, detecting, and mitigating cyber threats.
The non-profit group MITRE developed the ATT&CK framework in 2013 as a research project designed to improve understanding of how adversaries operate within networks. Unlike previous approaches that focused primarily on defensive tactics (such as signature-based detection), ATT&CK provided a model for describing the actual or most likely behavior of attackers once they’ve penetrated a network.
It started with a knowledge base of adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) that defenders could use to improve their own detection strategies. Over time, ATT&CK evolved into a wildly detailed (and honestly, pretty cool), ever-expanding database that covers various stages of the cyber kill chain—from initial access to execution, persistence, lateral movement, and exfiltration.
The ATT&CK matrix organizes tactics and techniques into a comprehensive graphical layout, making it easier for organizations to map their threat detection capabilities against real-world adversarial behaviors.
One of the most common applications of the MITRE ATT&CK framework is in threat hunting — the proactive search for indicators of compromise (IoCs) and adversarial activity within an organization’s network. Instead of waiting for automated systems to flag anomalies, threat hunters use ATT&CK to model potential attacker behaviors and identify the corresponding anomalous patterns in system activity, such as lateral movement, privilege escalation, and other malfeasance.
Security teams use ATT&CK to perform gap analysis — a structured review of their current detection and response capabilities. For instance, a SOC might map its current tools and processes to the tactics and techniques outlined in ATT&CK to identify gaps in monitoring or alerting. This approach ensures that organizations aren't merely focused on known threats but are also preparing for potential adversarial techniques they may not yet have encountered.
During a cyber incident, response teams can use ATT&CK to understand and categorize attacker behaviors more effectively. Analysts can map observed behaviors — such as file manipulation, lateral movement, or command-and-control (C2) activity — to techniques in the ATT&CK matrix after detecting an intrusion. This helps determine the stage of the attack and informs decisions about the most effective response strategies, ensuring that key steps, such as containment and eradication, are conducted based on known adversarial patterns. This is an effective way to “templatize” attacks, which makes the response faster and better contextualized.
Red team (offensive) and blue team (defensive) exercises are critical to assessing and improving an organization’s security posture. ATT&CK provides a common language for red and blue teams to communicate about adversarial behaviors. Red teams simulate attacks using techniques found in the ATT&CK matrix, while blue teams map their detection and response strategies to defend against them. After the exercises, both teams can review the ATT&CK framework to identify the techniques they detected, providing actionable insights for improving defenses.
Threat intelligence analysts use ATT&CK to categorize and analyze threat actor behaviors. By mapping observed TTPs from threat reports to the ATT&CK framework, analysts can better understand adversaries’ likely next moves, enabling organizations to implement preemptive measures. For example, if a specific group is known to use “Credential Dumping” or “DLL Side-loading,” defenders can prioritize monitoring for those techniques within their environments.
Security teams derive the most benefit from the MITRE ATT&CK framework by integrating it into TIPs, SIEMs, and SOAR platforms.
TIPs, such as Anomali ThreatStream, aggregate threat intelligence data from various sources, enabling organizations to manage and disseminate this intelligence internally. ATT&CK is integrated into ThreatStream to help analysts categorize and contextualize incoming threat data. When threat intelligence is mapped to the ATT&CK framework, analysts can quickly see which tactics and techniques adversaries are likely to employ. This structured approach helps prioritize alerts and tailor defense strategies to counter specific TTPs.
SIEM platforms, such as Anomali Security Analytics, ingest and correlate large volumes of log data from across an organization’s infrastructure. When integrated with ATT&CK, SIEMs can provide a richer context for alerts and anomalies. For example, if a SIEM detects suspicious activity, such as an unusual PowerShell script execution, it can correlate that activity with the relevant ATT&CK technique (e.g., “PowerShell Execution”). This not only aids in identifying the tactic being pursued but also helps automate the process of connecting the dots between seemingly isolated events.
SOAR platforms are designed to automate incident response and streamline security operations. ATT&CK integration with SOAR enables security teams to automate playbooks based on known adversarial techniques. For example, if a SOAR platform detects a technique such as credential dumping, it can automatically trigger an incident response workflow that includes isolating affected systems, capturing forensic data, and notifying relevant personnel or ISACs. This level of automation reduces response time and increases the likelihood of preventing the full execution of an attack.
As generative AI becomes more widely adopted in cybersecurity, it is having an obvious impact on the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Generative AI tools can be used for defensive and offensive purposes, presenting both opportunities and challenges for ATT&CK-based threat detection.
On the defensive side, AI-powered tools can enhance the detection of ATT&CK techniques by continuously monitoring for patterns that may indicate adversarial behavior. Generative AI can simulate potential attack scenarios that mirror the TTPs outlined in ATT&CK, enabling security teams to predict attacker behavior and adjust defenses proactively. Additionally, AI models can be trained to automatically map observed behaviors to ATT&CK techniques, improving the accuracy of threat correlation and reducing the burden on human analysts.
The rise of generative AI introduces new challenges. Adversaries cause AI to create more sophisticated attack techniques that evade traditional defenses, including those cataloged in ATT&CK. For instance, AI-generated malware can dynamically change its behavior to bypass detection, making it harder to map to known techniques. This will require expanding the ATT&CK framework to account for new, AI-driven tactics that blend or modify existing ones in unpredictable ways.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is likely to evolve in several ways as the cybersecurity landscape changes:
The MITRE ATT&CK framework has fundamentally reshaped how security teams think about threat detection, response, and prevention. By offering a structured and actionable model for understanding adversarial behaviors, ATT&CK allows organizations to stay one step ahead of attackers. This is particularly exemplified in Anomali ThreatStream, which currently supports MITRE 15.1 and includes support for all MITRE TTPs. This integration is critical for organizations aiming to strengthen their cybersecurity defenses, particularly when applied to multiple MITRE ATT&CK profiles, as described below
Anomali ThreatStream uses the MITRE ATT&CK framework to organize threat data by TTPs, enhancing their ability to detect and respond to a wider range of cyber threats.
Multiple profiles enable organizations to customize their defense strategies to address specific threat actors or scenarios. Each profile can focus on unique TTPs relevant to particular environments or threat models, allowing for more targeted and effective defenses.
Integrating the MITRE ATT&CK framework into ThreatStream enables better correlation and contextualization of threat data and provides actionable insights.
Security teams can quickly reference relevant profiles to understand the TTPs in use and apply the appropriate countermeasures, accelerating and improving incident response.
Mapping defenses to different profiles enables threat hunters to identify gaps and prioritize their activities, focusing on high-risk areas where detection and mitigation might be lacking.
Multiple profiles serve as an educational resource for security teams, helping them simulate various attack scenarios, understand the behaviors of different threat actors, and prepare for a wide range of potential threats.
Using multiple profiles allows teams to tailor reports and analyses for different stakeholders with specific concerns. For example, security teams might want technical details, whereas executive management might need high-level summaries.
Employing multiple MITRE ATT&CK profiles shows that the organization is proactive in understanding and mitigating a diverse set of threats — essential for maintaining compliance and fostering trust with stakeholders.
As generative AI continues to influence both attackers and defenders and as the cyber landscape and its associated security stacks grow more complex, MITRE ATT&CK will need to evolve, offering new tools and insights to address these challenges. Whether in the context of TIPs, SIEMs, or SOAR, the future of ATT&CK is deeply tied to the next wave of cybersecurity innovations, ensuring it remains a vital tool for SOCs worldwide.
FEATURED RESOURCES

